The City of Albany needs housing of all types, in all neighborhoods, using every lever and tool available. We want new duplexes off of Whitehall, infill housing on Clinton Ave, a cluster of single family homes to evolve in swaths of undeveloped land west of Hwy 85, and apartment buildings - both market rate and low income - dotted around the City.
In the last decade 75% of the residential housing unit development (setting aside 2 privately-financed student housing projects) has been driven by IDA-supported projects. If Albany had a comprehensive housing strategy (which it doesn’t) it would be a strategy of putting almost all of our eggs in one IDA-supported basket. We have found this research paper to be a good aid to understand the benefits and concerns about IDA-supporting housing.
Setting aside the City’s over-dependency on IDA-supported housing, the operative question is what is causing a lack of privately financed single family homes, duplexes, triplex and quadplex housing development? We suspect a few factors:
- The appeal of Albany - do household-level concerns about making an investment in a new residential home in the City cause inaction, and do households make their investments elsewhere?
- The City’s zoning code - which generally limits the types of construction to the housing mix that already exists in areas.
- NIMBY-ism - zoning appeal meetings bring out all manner of objections - sightlines, “neighborhood character”, parking and more - which shut down some amount of development.
- The inclusionary zoning law - may have limited some volume of large apartment construction, however this would not have impacted single family home through small (< 20 unit) construction.
- Costs - is the City adding costs to construction (e.g. permitting) that are above and beyond the costs found elsewhere and/or does the pace of construction lag (due to permitting, approvals, etc) present added cost of capital?
We performed this analysis with a belief that if we don’t understand recent history we won’t be able to influence or change our future housing development behaviors. Some of those future behaviors include how the City supports the construction of privately financed housing by eliminating costs and barriers to construction.
There are numerous starting points for these discussions including StrongTowns’s view of a housing-ready city, Yimby’s views into addressing housing barriers, case studies of infill housing, and more. Importantly, we are not the only City who is facing similar housing development challenges; let’s look at the successes and failures of other cities and learn.
Thoughts, questions, criticisms? Drop us a note at albanydatastories@gmail.com or respond to any of our social media postings.
Interested in other pieces that Albany Data Stories has written about housing and development: