The City of Albany and the Strong Towns Finance Decoder
We wanted to find a way to view the health of the City of Albany’s finances over time and we found the Strong Towns Financial Decoder, which we will use in this article.
If you haven’t heard of Strong Towns, we love their vision “Your community needs you to be an effective advocate for change. We can help you get there” which is something that we relate to. Strong Towns has some great journalism and opinion pieces; we like this article as an example of a quality piece that speaks to how we measure America’s infrastructure.
Strong Towns recently released the Finance Decoder, a tool to “visualize your city’s financial trajectory, and understand whether your city is on track to keep its development, service and growth promises.” The tool is fairly straightforward: 1) you collect your city’s yearly, publicly-available audited statements, 2) wade through the audited statements to find a dozen key numbers and input them into the Decoder tool (a Google Sheet), 3) review to make sure you did the data entry correct. What do Audited Statements look like? This is an example from 2018 of the City of Albany’s Audited Financial Statement that we are drawing data from.
We like the Strong Towns’ Finance Decoder for a number of reasons. You don’t need to be a CPA to input the data, you only need some patience to find key numbers such as the City’s total liabilities, or yearly interest payments. The tool presents the City’s data using 7 basic charts which are relatively easy for a layperson (like us!) to visualize and understand. The story presented is high level and does not get into the weeds; having read through a number of the Audited Statements it is easy to get overwhelmed with accounting details.
In the remainder of this article we will speak to our high level process, we will describe one of the biggest caveats when looking at the data, we will show the 7 charts with their descriptions, and lastly we will provide a more detailed account of our process for those who want to know and/or validate what we did.
Sustainability Indicator - Net Financial Position
What it is:
The difference between the city’s financial assets (like cash and receivables) and its liabilities (like debt and pensions). This is the cumulative surplus/deficit that the city has accumulated through successive budget cycles.
What it tells you:
A positive net financial position suggests the city has more financial assets than obligations and is in a better position to weather downturns, invest in infrastructure, or respond to emergencies without resorting to borrowing or service cuts. If this number is negative, the city has spent more than it has saved and is relying on future revenue to pay past bills.
What the trend shows:
A downward trend means the city is growing more reliant on borrowing or deferring payments. An upward trend means it’s becoming more financially secure.
Sustainability Indicator - Assets to Liabilities
What it is:
The city’s financial assets—such as cash, receivables, and other short-term holdings—divided by its total liabilities. This is a different way of presenting the Net Financial Position.
What it tells you:
This ratio shows whether the city has enough liquid financial resources to cover what it owes. A ratio below 1 means it would not be able to pay off its liabilities using only its financial assets, which is a sign of financial stress.
What the trend shows:
A rising trend means the city is improving its financial buffer. A falling trend suggests the city is becoming less able to handle its obligations without borrowing or cutting services.
Sustainability Indicator - Assets to Liabilities
What it is:
The value of all the city’s assets (including infrastructure) divided by its total liabilities.
What it tells you:
A ratio above 1 means the city owns more than it owes (solvent). Below 1 means it owes more than it owns (insolvent).
What the trend shows:
A downward trend means the city is becoming less solvent. An upward trend shows improving financial resilience.
Sustainability Indicator - Debt to Total Revenues
What it is:
The total liabilities the city owes compared to how much revenue it collects in a year.
What it tells you:
This shows how many years of income it would take to pay off all debts if every dollar went to debt repayment.
What the trend shows:
If the ratio is rising, debt is growing faster than income—this is unsustainable. If it’s falling, the city is gaining control of its obligations.
Flexibility Indicator - Interest to Revenues
What it is:
The percentage of annual revenue spent on interest payments.
What it tells you:
This shows how much of the budget is consumed by past borrowing. The higher the percentage, the less room for services, maintenance, or investment.
What the trend shows:
An increasing trend limits future choices and can crowd out basic services. A decreasing trend improves flexibility and budget health.
Flexibility Indicator - Value to cost of tangible assets
What it is:
The current value of the city’s physical assets compared to their original cost.
What it tells you:
This indicates how well the city is maintaining its infrastructure. A low value means assets are aging and wearing out.
What the trend shows:
A declining trend means the city is falling behind on maintenance. A stable or rising trend suggests it is keeping up
Results - Govt Transfers to Total revenue
What it is:
The share of the city’s income that comes from state or federal aid.
What it tells you:
High dependency on outside funding makes the city vulnerable to political or economic shifts beyond its control.
What the trend shows:
If the trend is rising, the city is becoming more dependent on outside help. If it’s falling, the city is strengthening its local revenue base.