Instances of crime can impact our perception of a neighborhood or city as a whole. These conversations take place between neighbors, in anonymous online discussions and with prospective home buyers. One of our reasons for publishing this story was to highlight that not only is crime data collected and analyzed by the Albany Police Department, but that thoughtful and unbiased analysis of that data should be the cornerstone of our conversations.
We also feel strongly that important data like this should be readily available on Albany's Open Data site, and that this data should not require a FOIA. FOIAs are unnecessary barriers to viewing, analyzing, and reporting data collected by city employees in the form of public records. The Albany Police Department has been the biggest contributor to Albany's Open Data site, however comprehensive crime data was not available. It was necessary to use the Freedom of Information Act to request and obtain crime data from 2020 to the present (March 2025).
From our FOIA request we obtained over 78,000 recorded crime instances starting January 1st, 2020. As we examined the data, we had no preconceived notion of how the data would unfold. As we present our findings, we do our best to explain why we chose to group certain categories and why we selectively excluded certain data.
While performing the analysis on the crime data, the Times Union published an article (https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/albany-s-mayoral-candidates-tackle-public-safety-20213412.php) discussing Albany’s mayoral candidates' views on crime in the city of Albany. There are quotes from Dorcey Applyrs, Dan Cerutti, Corey Ellis, and Carolyn McLaughlin. Although every candidate spoke about their perspective on crime, no candidate directly referenced Albany's crime data to support their positions or policies. We hope our article brings data into the political discourse, and that candidates acknowledge trends occurring in Albany and that the policies they’re advocating for are rooted in facts.
We, the authors, recognize that collecting and analyzing crime data is challenging. In the 5-year study period, a) it’s possible that procedural changes may have occurred in how crime data is collected, b) the data was collected over a period that encompassed the 2020 and 2021 lockdown periods, c) police staffing levels were not consistent, and d) the data may or may not account for other agencies responding to crime incidents. We decided it is better to analyze the data on hand and note that these different factors may have an impact to our results rather than attempt to make erroneous corrections to the data.
Lastly, while we are looking at crime data with an analytical view we do not wish to ignore the mental and physical toll that crime has on victims, and our analysis is not a criticism or critique of the Albany Police Department.