From our analysis we have several recommendations.
1. Crime Data availability. In 2025 we noted this about the availability of crime data:
“We also feel strongly that important data like this should be readily available on Albany's Open Data site, and that this data should not require a FOIL. FOILs are unnecessary barriers to viewing, analyzing, and reporting data collected by city employees in the form of public records. The Albany Police Department has been the biggest contributor to Albany's Open Data site, however comprehensive crime data was not available. It was necessary to use the Freedom of Information Act to request and obtain crime data from 2020 to the present (March 2025).”
Albany’s Open Data site became inactive for unknown reasons in January 2026. We had to use a FOIL to obtain the latest data. Our position remains unchanged - crime data should not be hidden behind a FOIL.
2. Leadership commentary and use of crime data. We identified only a single time in 2025 where the City’s leadership spoke about Crime using data and statistics, a press conference by then Mayor Sheehan and Police Chief Cox, published in a May, 2025 TImes Union Story. That story reported “violent crime has dropped 14% since last June”, which overall is supported by our analysis.
In early July 2026, Mayor Dorcey Applyrs, Albany Police Chief Brendan Cox and Albany County District Attorney Lee Kindlon held a press conference where a few 2026 year-to-date crime statistics were revealed to demonstrate crime trends.
While we may have missed one or more events where data was used by the City’s leadership to discuss crime, the use of data by our leadership to explain crime is an exceptional event, typically in reaction to a crisis or a programmatic announcement. The City’s leadership should regularly be using up-to-date data in their communications about incidents, trends and how those drive operational actions. Data that provides the details, and that allows for citizen validation, should be made available to the public concurrent with these communications.
3. Leadership explaining their view of why. We want leadership to connect the dots between an action or an externality and the crime data.
As illustrative examples:
- “We started <some program> which we believe led to <some outcome>”
- “Our ability to fill <X number of police positions> led to <some outcome>”
- “Nationwide our crime rate appears to be going down because of <aging population, better economy, etc> and the City appears to mirror this trend
The leadership is best positioned to make their case for connecting actions or socioeconomic changes to the crime trends in the City. It is a reasonable expectation that we should get that view from leadership. This will help the City understand the value of the investments that we are making (e.g. the City’s Office of Violence Prevention, the need for additional officer staffing) and changes to policing methods or resource allocation.
Have any thoughts or comments about our analysis or article? Follow our posts on Social Media (Facebook and Reddit) and comment there, or drop us a note at AlbanyDataStories@gmail.com